Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Peter Luczak vs Johan Brunstrom Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Luczak vs Brunstrom analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
 First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Peter Luczak vs Johan Brunstrom Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Luczak 1 - 0 Brunstrom
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Luczak has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Brunstrom has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Luczak, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Brunstrom has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Luczak has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Brunstrom has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Luczak has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Brunstrom winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Luczak has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 219/ 143), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 11/ 15). Brunstrom has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 37/ 23), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Luczak winning 1 times and Brunstrom being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Luczak winning 2 and Brunstrom winning 0. The last match between Luczak and Brunstrom was at the Kia International In Caloundra - Caloundra, 17-11-2006, Quarterfinals, Hard with Peter Luczak getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Luczak and Brunstrom have played a deciding set 0 times, with Luczak winning 0 times and Brunstrom 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Luczak winning 1, and Brunstrom 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Luczak has played against opponents with an average rank of while Brunstrom has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Luczak has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Brunstrom has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Luczak has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Brunstrom has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
64
High
44
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
377
High
44
Age
L
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
55% (370-298)
Career Total W/L
57% (128-98)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$303,620
Career Prize Money
$5,660
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Peter Luczak vs Johan Brunstrom For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Luczak VS Brunstrom
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit DoubledÂ
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Peter Luczak | Johan Brunstrom |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Peter Luczak | Johan Brunstrom |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Peter Luczak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats 
Paul-Henri Mathieu
Player
Peter Luczak
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Peter Luczak
Player
Stefan Lindmark
63%
(
67 of
107)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
101)
9
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
8
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
36 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
101)
113
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Frederik Nielsen
Player
Peter Luczak
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
7
Aces
4
-
Double Faults
-
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Peter Luczak
Player
Dominik Meffert
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Andrey Golubev
Player
Peter Luczak
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
26
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
3
85%
(
51 of
60)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
28 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
23 of
82)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Peter Luczak
Player
Lucas Renard
54%
(
60 of
111)
1st Serve %
65%
(
72 of
111)
9
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
6
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
57 of
72)
65%
(
33 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
29 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
33 of
111)
115
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(5) 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Grega Zemlja
Player
Peter Luczak
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
42%
(
23 of
55)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
0
Total Points Won
0
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luka Gregorc
Player
Peter Luczak
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
41 of
76)
5
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
7
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Peter Luczak
Player
Colin Ebelthite
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
66 of
113)
11
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
43 of
66)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
52 of
113)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Johan Brunstrom Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Johan Brunstrom
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
36%
(
24 of
67)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
8
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
19 of
24)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Johan Brunstrom
Player
Pedro Bernardi
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
10
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
3
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
8 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Viktor Troicki
Player
Johan Brunstrom
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
82)
11
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
8
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
36 of
42)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
20%
(
14 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
25 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Johan Brunstrom
Player
Zhicheng Zhu
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
9
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 6-4 6-4 5-7 3-6 13-11 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jaan-Frederik Brunken
Player
Johan Brunstrom
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
10
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(7) 6-7(3) 0-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Thomas Schoorel
Player
Johan Brunstrom
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
11
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
8
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Johan Brunstrom
Player
John El Khoury
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Joseph Sirianni
Player
Johan Brunstrom
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
7
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Luczak Vs Brunstrom Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Luczak are available here and Brunstrom photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
